Follow us on social

google cta
Benjamin Netanyahu

Another poll shows Americans’ declining support for Israel

And their favorability of Netanyahu is abysmally low

Reporting | QiOSK
google cta
google cta

The percentage of registered American voters who believe that support for Israel serves the U.S. national interest has fallen sharply over the last 21 months of Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, according to the findings of a new survey released by the Quinnipiac University Poll.

Less than half of American voters — 47% — say they believe that support for Israel is in the national interest of the United States, according to the survey, which was based on the responses of 1,276 self-identified registered voters September 18–21.

That was down from 69% in December 2023, three-and-a-half months after the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel that launched the war.

Forty-one percent of the survey’s respondents said they believed U.S. support for Israel does not serve the national interest. The remainder offered no opinion.

Opinions of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were even more negative. Only 21% of respondents said they had a favorable opinion of Netanyahu, who is scheduled to address the U.N. General Assembly Friday. Nearly half — 49% — said they held an unfavorable view of the Israeli leader, while 31% either refused to answer (3%) or hadn’t hear enough to offer an opinion (28%).

The survey also found nearly as strong disapproval of “the way (President) Donald Trump is handling the Israel-Hamas conflict.” Only 31% of respondents said they approved of his handling of the war, which has been characterized by virtually unconditional U.S. support for Netanyahu. A solid majority of respondents (56%) said they disapproved.

In a survey released August 27, a separate Quinnipiac poll found that no less than 50% of respondents, including one of five self-identified Republican voters, said they believed that Israel was committing a genocide in Gaza.

Meanwhile, significantly more voters, according to the latest survey, believe that supporting Ukraine serves U.S. national interests than those who believe that supporting Israel does. Nearly two in three voters (64%), including 50% of self-identified Republicans, said they believe that supporting Ukraine serves U.S. interests, while only one if four (26%) said they believe U.S. support for Kyiv did not serve the national interest.

One in three respondents (33%), and only 3% of self-identified Democrats, said they approved of Trump’s handling of the Russia-Ukraine war, while 56%, including 14% of Republicans, voiced disapproval.

The poll’s findings on Israel are consistent with other recent surveys that show unprecedented declines in support for Israel.

A poll released last month by the University of Maryland’s Critical Issues series found for the first time in a national poll that more Americans sympathized with Palestinians (28%) than with Israelis (22%). It also found that 41% of its respondents believed that Israel was committing a genocide or a campaign “akin to genocide” in Gaza.

A Gallup poll released in late July found that public support for Israel’s actions in Gaza had fallen from 50% to 32% over 17 months. It found that support for Israel had hemorrhaged among younger voters, Democrats and self-identified Independents.

The latest Quinnipiac poll found significant differences in views about support for Israel serving U.S. national interests. Three of every four self-identified Republicans said they believe that support for Israel serves U.S. interests, while only 36% of Democrats and 37% of Independents agreed.

Remarkably, more Independents (53%) than Democrats (49%) said they believed support for Israel did not serve U.S. national interests. Nearly one in five Republicans (19%) agreed.

Republicans were also significantly disposed to view Netanyahu favorably (47%), while only 4% of Democrats and 14% agreed. Seven out of ten Democrats (70%) and nearly six of ten (58%) of Independents said they viewed him unfavorably as did one in five (20%) of Republicans.


Top image credti: Gil Cohen Magen / Shutterstock.com
google cta
Reporting | QiOSK
Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?
Top image credit: President Donald J. Trump holds a joint news conference at the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Feb. 4, 2025. (Shutterstock/ Joshua Sukoff)

Did the US only attack Iran because of Israel?

QiOSK

In the months that led up to the Iraq War, the Bush administration went to extraordinary lengths to convince the world of the need to oust Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. Leading officials laid out their case in public, sharing what they claimed was evidence that Iraq was moving rapidly toward the deployment of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. When U.S. tanks rolled across the border, everyone knew the justification: the U.S. was determined to thwart Iraq’s development of weapons of mass destruction, however fictitious that threat would later prove to be.

In the months that led up to the Iran War, the Trump administration took a different tack. President Trump spoke only occasionally of Iran, offering a smattering of justifications for growing U.S. tensions with the country. He claimed without evidence that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program after the U.S.-Israeli attack last June and even developing missiles that could strike the United States. But he insisted that Tehran could make a deal with seven magic words: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”

keep readingShow less
Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports
Top image credit: A large oil tanker transits the Strait of Hormuz. (Shutterstock/ Clare Louise Jackson)

Iran says ‘no ship is allowed to pass’ Strait of Hormuz: Reports

QiOSK

Hours after the U.S. and Israel launched a campaign of airstrikes across Iran, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is warning vessels in the Persian Gulf via radio that “no ship is allowed to pass the Strait of Hormuz,” according to a report from Reuters.

The news suggests that Iran is ready to pull out all the stops in its response to the U.S.-Israeli barrage, which President Donald Trump says is aimed at toppling the Iranian regime. A full shutdown of the Strait of Hormuz would cause an international crisis given that 20% of the world’s oil passes through the narrow channel. Financial analysts estimate that even one day of a full blockade could cause global oil prices to double from $66 per barrel to more than $120.

keep readingShow less
Ro Khanna Jon Fetterman
Top photo credit: Ro Khanna (creative commons/WebSummitt ) and Jon Fetterman (shutterstock/EB Photos)

Fury and fanboys: US, world leaders react to US-Israeli war on Iran

QiOSK

The reactions are already coming in following the early morning attacks on Iran by U.S. and Israeli forces in what is being called "Operation Epic Fury." The reports are fluid, but as President Trump announced on his Truth Social, the U.S. is taking aim at Iran's military and senior leadership and hopes to raze both so that the Iranian people can take over. "When we are finished the government is yours to take. Your hour of freedom is at hand."

For some, like U.S. Senator Jon Fetterman, a Democrat who represents the people of Pennsylvania, this is the greatest thing to happen since the last time the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran in June. "President Trump has been willing to do what’s right and necessary to produce real peace in the region. God bless the United States, our great military, and Israel."

keep readingShow less
google cta
Want more of our stories on Google?
Click here to make us a Preferred Source.

LATEST

QIOSK

Newsletter

Subscribe now to our weekly round-up and don't miss a beat with your favorite RS contributors and reporters, as well as staff analysis, opinion, and news promoting a positive, non-partisan vision of U.S. foreign policy.